Watching Halloween on Blu-Ray
Oct. 17th, 2013 10:34 amYay! I'm back to work. Thankfully, as I was getting a bit stir-crazy at home.
Last weekend, my buddies Drew and Bill had a few of us over for a late evening cookout. It was a spontaneous thing with little notice. Brian (
cincycub) was there and so was a new guy, a 23-year old cubby named Jordan. So after dinner, we went to the living room to watch a movie. Bill had just received the 35th anniversary edition of "Halloween" from 1978, so we coerced his other half to sit through it with us.
I have to admit, the new Blu-ray version was crystal clear on their HD television. You could see everything, the leaves on the trees, the knit of the outfit, etc. It's strange to see such detail on a movie filmed that long ago. Everything also seemed brighter, which was one of the complaints online was that the special blue filter they used to make it look like fall was supposedly gone.
What struck me so odd was that the improvements that made the movie seem so clear and detailed also made the movie appear cheaply done. I know it was an independent movie done on a shoestring budget, but the original version hides a lot of imperfections that the new HD detail seems to bring forward. The movie is still fun to watch, but it almost looks like it was filmed with a hand-held camera.
The best part was watching it with friends after drinking a few beers and critiquing certain parts:
Even more fun was explaining the older stuff to the 23-year-old, such as a rotary dial phone, how taking a phone off the hook would prevent it from ringing, why there is a phone booth in the middle of nowhere for people to use, etc.
I liked the remastered movie, despite the flaws I see in it. I ordered it from Amazon today.
Last weekend, my buddies Drew and Bill had a few of us over for a late evening cookout. It was a spontaneous thing with little notice. Brian (
I have to admit, the new Blu-ray version was crystal clear on their HD television. You could see everything, the leaves on the trees, the knit of the outfit, etc. It's strange to see such detail on a movie filmed that long ago. Everything also seemed brighter, which was one of the complaints online was that the special blue filter they used to make it look like fall was supposedly gone.
What struck me so odd was that the improvements that made the movie seem so clear and detailed also made the movie appear cheaply done. I know it was an independent movie done on a shoestring budget, but the original version hides a lot of imperfections that the new HD detail seems to bring forward. The movie is still fun to watch, but it almost looks like it was filmed with a hand-held camera.
The best part was watching it with friends after drinking a few beers and critiquing certain parts:
- "If Laurie looked out the window to see a guy across the street in a mask staring at her, why doesn't she scream?"
- As Annie and Laurie are driving to their respective babysitting gigs, they are sharing a joint. Annie freaks out when she sees her dad, the sheriff, at the hardware store that has been burglarized. She quickly tries to get rid of the joint. Drew asked, "surely she realizes that she doesn't have to stop, right? She could just drive on by as her dad is busy."
- We think that the Sheriff and Dr. Loomis are having a thing, since they are spending so much time together in the bushes.
- Dr. Loomis finally turns around and sees the state car that Michael stole right behind him, parked on the street, even though he's been hiding in the same bushes for hours and never looked around.
Even more fun was explaining the older stuff to the 23-year-old, such as a rotary dial phone, how taking a phone off the hook would prevent it from ringing, why there is a phone booth in the middle of nowhere for people to use, etc.
I liked the remastered movie, despite the flaws I see in it. I ordered it from Amazon today.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 02:46 pm (UTC)Hope your return to work isn't going to keep you insanely busy...
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 04:54 pm (UTC)And we're all playing catch up now. I'm sure it'll keep us busy for a while.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 05:15 pm (UTC)oooooooooh, and every actor had a full thick chest of hair, not even remotely covered or trimmed. those were the days
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 07:29 pm (UTC)I find it scary what I can remember and what youngsters can't. I find it even more scary that I'm old enough to consider a 23-year old a youngster. I'm getting older, my friend.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-17 09:04 pm (UTC)Glad you enjoyed the movie-haven't seen that one in a few years, but I'm certain it'll be on TV this month at some point.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-20 02:26 am (UTC)Love the things the 23 year-old was clueless about.
One of my grad students found an old ZIP disc in a drawer in the lab. She turned to me and another student, and asked what it was. I said "Ummm.It's a ZIP disc." She looked at the other student. He shrugged and they looked at me like I had two heads.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-20 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-22 01:09 am (UTC)We used punch cards in high school and for a while, even in college. LOL
no subject
Date: 2013-10-22 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-23 02:10 am (UTC)In college there was a senior-level course in animal behavior that was computer intensive-lots of modeling. When I was a freshman, my upper class friends had to use punch card, load them into a VAX mainframe, and get the raw data printed out on huge roller feed paper, then plot all the graphs. If they were wrong, they had to do it all over again. There were always bottlenecks with the engineering students, all trying to get data into the VAX. By the time I was senior, they had switched to PCs and we had math processors that could crunch the numbers and spit out the graph plots in about a minute or two. My friends who had to use punch cards were so jealous of us!